Presenting new models to determine subgrade reaction modulus (Ks) for optimizing foundation calculations in coarse grained soils

Authors

  • Naser Hafezi Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Iran)
  • Pouya Salari Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Iran)
  • Gholam Reza Lashkaripour Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Iran)
  • Mohammad Ghafoori Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Iran)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.19.2.235-243

Keywords:

subgrade reaction modulus, plate load test, coarse-grained sediments, foundation properties, results generalization

Abstract

Subgrade reaction modulus (Ks) is one of the most important soil parameters to perform structural calculations and analysis. Ks directly affects the determination of dimensions and reinforcement of foundations. Therefore, its exact and accurate determination is of significant importance in terms of economy and safety, especially in large structures. To calculate the coefficient, it is possible to use either the previously presented experimental relations or directly from field tests such as plate load tests. In the present study, 36 plate load tests (PLTs) were performed on the rigid plates with 20 cm, 30 cm and 45 cm diameters (12 tests  on each plate) on coarse-grained sediments of the west of Mashhad, Iran. Then the results were analyzed and a new equation was presented to determine Ks by considering soil and foundation properties no need to costly tests. Then, a new model was presented to generalize the results of plate load tests to actual dimensions of the foundation in the case of the test because of the difference between real foundation dimensions and loading tests plates. Also,  the obtained equation and model were validated and results were compared with previous relations and tests outputs.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Hafezi, N., Salari, P., Reza Lashkaripour, G., & Ghafoori, M. (2020). Presenting new models to determine subgrade reaction modulus (Ks) for optimizing foundation calculations in coarse grained soils. Revista De La Construcción. Journal of Construction, 19(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.19.2.235-243