Serviceability analysis and increased axle load performance of heritage arch gallery railway bridge

  • Madappa VR Sivasubramanian Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry (India)
  • Vinay Shimpi Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry (India)
  • S.B. Singh Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani, 333031, Rajasthan (India)
Keywords: heritage structure, moving load analysis, serviceability, ambient vibration test, masonry arch bridge

Abstract

This investigation deals with the serviceability analysis and increased axle load performance of Bridge No. 541 of UNESCO recognised Kalka Shimla Mountain Railways, which is a multi-storey arch gallery stone masonry bridge situated in the state of Himachal Pradesh, India.  For this purpose, a finite element (FE) model was developed based on the drawings and reports available in Shimla Division, Northern Railways, India. Further, the results obtained from ambient vibration test (AVT) and operational modal analysis (OMA) is utilized to model update the initial FE model by modifying the mechanical properties of stone masonry. The serviceability against present-day axle loading (H Class Loading, Indian Railways) and present speed of the train is assessed.  At last, a parametric study is conducted to understand the feasibility to attain higher speeds (up to 40 kmph) of the present axle load and higher axle load with different speeds of the train over the bridge to check the serviceability conditions advised in the Indian Railways code and also International codes. Finally, the study concluded that Bridge No. 541 of Kalka Shimla Mountain Railways can sustain speeds up to 40 kmph for current axle loading satisfying serviceability conditions.

Author Biographies

Madappa VR Sivasubramanian, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry (India)

Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry

Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry (India)

 

madappa@nitpy.ac.in

Vinay Shimpi , Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry (India)

Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry

Karaikal, Puducherry, 609609  (India)

vinay.nitpy@gmail.com

S.B. Singh, Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani, 333031, Rajasthan (India)

Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani

Pilani, 333031, Rajasthan (India)

References

Altunişik, A. C., Genç, A. F., Günaydin, M., Okur, F. Y., & Karahasan, O. Ş. (2018). Dynamic response of a historical armory building using the finite element model validated by the ambient vibration test. JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control, 24(22), 5472–5484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546318755559

AREMA. (2006). AREMA manual. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, Lanham, MD, USA.

AREMA. (2008). AREMA bridge inspection handbook. AREMA Committee 10.

Ataei, S., Jahangiri Alikamar, M., & Kazemiashtiani, V. (2016). Evaluation of axle load increasing on a monumental masonry arch bridge based on field load testing. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 413–421. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.126

Ataei, S., Miri, A., & Jahangiri, M. (2017). Assessment of load carrying capacity enhancement of an open spandrel masonry arch bridge by dynamic load testing. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 11(8), 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1317882

Aytulun, E., Soyoz, S., & Karcioglu, E. (2019). System Identification and Seismic Performance Assessment of a Stone Arch Bridge. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, ISSN: 1363-2469, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1692740

Banerji, P., & Chikermane, S. (2012). Condition assessment of a heritage arch bridge using a novel model updation technique. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-011-0013-9

Bautista-De Castro, Á., Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Carrasco-García, P., Ramos, L. F., & González-Aguilera, D. (2019). A multidisciplinary approach to calibrating advanced numerical simulations of masonry arch bridges. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 129, 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.043

Bayraktar, A., Altunişik, A. C., Birinci, F., Sevim, B., & Türker, T. (2010). Finite-Element Analysis and Vibration Testing of a Two-Span Masonry Arch Bridge. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 24(1), 46–52. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000060

Bertolesi, E., Milani, G., Lopane, F. D., & Acito, M. (2017). Augustus Bridge in Narni (Italy): Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of the Still Standing Part, Possible Causes of Collapse, and Importance of the Roman Concrete Infill in the Seismic-Resistant Behavior. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 11(5), 717–746. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1300712

Boothby, T. E. (2001). Load rating of masonry arch bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 6(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:2(79)

Brencich, A., & Sabia, D. (2008). Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge. Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), 2087–2099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031

Eurocode C.E.N. (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. Brussels: European Standard EN, 2.

Consuegra, F. A., & Santos, C. (2015). Vibration analyses for the local and global evaluation of bridges as a tool for structural retrofit. Revista de La Construccion, 14(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-915x2015000100002

De Santis, S., & De Felice, G. (2014). Overview of railway masonry bridges with a safety factor estimate. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 8(3), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2013.826298

Dhanasekar, M., Prasad, P., Dorji, J., & Zahra, T. (2019). Serviceability Assessment of Masonry Arch Bridges Using Digital Image Correlation. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001341

Di Lorenzo, G., Formisano, A., Krstevska, L., & Landolfo, R. (2019). Ambient vibration test and numerical investigation on the St. Giuliano church in Poggio Picenze (L’aquila, Italy). Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 9(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00346-7

Fanning, P. J., & Boothby, T. E. (2001). Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Computers and Structures, 79(29–30), 2645–2662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00109-2

Gentile, C., & Saisi, A. (2011). Ambient vibration testing and condition assessment of the Paderno iron arch bridge (1889). Construction and Building Materials, 25(9), 3709–3720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.019

ICOMOS. (2008). Kalka Shimla Railway ( India ) No 944 ter, ICOMOS, Paris, France.

IRICEN. (2009). Inspection, Assessment, Repairs and Retrofit of Masonry Arch Bridges. Pune Maharastra India, 411001: Indian Railway Institute of Civil Engineering.

Kaliyaperumal, G., Imam, B., & Righiniotis, T. (2011). Advanced dynamic finite element analysis of a skew steel railway bridge. Engineering Structures, 33(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.003

Kishen, J. M. C., Ramaswamy, A., & Manohar, C. S. (2013). Safety assessment of a masonry arch bridge: Field testing and simulations. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000338

Kwark, J. W., Choi, E. S., Kim, Y. J., Kim, B. S., & Kim, S. I. (2004). Dynamic behavior of two-span continuous concrete bridges under moving high-speed train. Computers and Structures, 82(4–5), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00054-3

Lauren Uppink Calderwood Maksim Soshkin. (2019). The Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report 2019. Geneva: World Economuc Forum. Available on: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_2019.pdf

Mathur, V. N. (2008). Bridges, Buildings & Black Beauties of Northern Railway: Glimpses of the Rich Heritage of India's Premier Railway. Institute of Rail Transport.

Milani, G., Casolo, S., Naliato, A., & Tralli, A. (2012). Seismic assessment of a medieval masonry tower in Northern Italy by limit, nonlinear static, and full dynamic analyses. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6(5), 489–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2011.588987

Milani, G., & Lourenço, P. B. (2012). 3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges. Computers and Structures, 110, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.008

OROS. (2018). Modal Structural Solution Manual. OROS, Meylan, France.

Ozcelik, O., Yormaz, D., Amaddeo, C., Girgin, O., & Kahraman, S. (2019). System Identification of a Six-Span Steel Railway Bridge Using Ambient Vibration Measurements at Different Temperature Conditions. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001260

Pedrosa, B., Rebelo, C., Gervásio, H., & da Silva, L. S. (2019). Modal Identification and Strengthening Techniques on Centenary Portela Bridge. Structural Engineering International, 29(4), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1612314

RDSO. (1962). Indian Railway standard code of practice for the design and construction of masonry and plain concrete arch bridges - Arch Bridge Code 6, Lucknow, India .

RDSO. (2008). Bridge rules: Rules specifying the loads for design of super-structure and sub-structure of bridges and for assessment of the strength of existing bridges. Lucknow, India: RESEARCH DESIGNS AND STANDARDS ORGANISATION.

Roselli, I., Malena, M., Mongelli, M., Cavalagli, N., Gioffrè, M., De Canio, G., & de Felice, G. (2018). Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the “Ponte delle Torri” of Spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 8(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0268-5

Sarhosis, V., De Santis, S., & de Felice, G. (2016). A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(11), 1439–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1136655

Sevim, B., Atamturktur, S., Altunişik, A. C., & Bayraktar, A. (2016). Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(1), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6

Shimpi, V., Sivasubramanian, M. V. R., & Singh, S. B. (2019). System identification of heritage structures through AVT and OMA: A review. SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2019.05951

Sun, L., & Xu, Y. (2020). Modal parameter identification and finite element model updating of a long-span aqueduct structure based on ambient excitation. Journal of Vibroengineering, 22(4), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2020.21271

Tubaldi, E., Macorini, L., & Izzuddin, B. A. (2020). Identification of critical mechanical parameters for advanced analysis of masonry arch bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1655071

Zhang, L., Wang, T., & Tamura, Y. (2010). A frequency-spatial domain decomposition (FSDD) method for operational modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.024

Zonno, G., Aguilar, R., Boroschek, R., & Lourenço, P. B. (2019). Environmental and Ambient Vibration Monitoring of Historical Adobe Buildings: Applications in Emblematic Andean Churches. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, ISSN: 1558-3058, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1653402

Published
2021-04-22