Care and Repair through Intimacy: A Live Lab Approach in the Garden City

Main Article Content

Josymar Rodríguez Alfonzo
Liesbeth Huybrechts

Abstract

Participatory Design (PD) is increasingly interested in the repair process, motivated by the curiosity to articulate a more caring and relational attitude toward our socioecological environment. However, placing ‘repair’ centrally in PD is difficult, since the latter has been traditionally focused on ‘making together’ and less on repairing what was once made, or even ‘unmake’. While repair is part of our continuous activities (repairing clothes, bikes, marriages, and relationships), it is often a painful and challenging endeavor. Repair entails hope but also grief. This article discusses how we used a Live Lab to explore more intimate design approaches, opening pathways to explore plural relations and access embodied and emotional knowledge. Finally, based on our research experience in a garden city, we reflect upon how acting within an intimacy framework contributes to PD’s repair process, by bringing socioecological entanglements to the agenda of citizens.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez Alfonzo, J., Roosen, B., & Huybrechts, L. (2024). Care and Repair through Intimacy: A Live Lab Approach in the Garden City. Diseña, (24), Article.4. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.24.Article.4
Section
Original articles
Author Biographies

Josymar Rodríguez Alfonzo, UHasselt

Ph.D. candidate, Hasselt University. She is working on spatial transformation and participatory design in the Spatial Capacity Building research group at the Faculty of Architecture and Art, Hasselt University. Activist and architect, she holds a bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Universidad Simón Bolívar, and a master’s degree in Architecture specializing in spatial justice from the University of Oregon (as a Fulbright Scholarship recipient). She is a founding director of Incursiones, a laboratory striving to transform the city’s shared spaces and dynamics through projects that expand the range and quality of interactions between the environment and its inhabitants. Her projects vary from temporary installations to small-scale infrastructure in self-built settlements, exhibition design, and education.

Barbara Roosen, UHasselt

Postdoctoral researcher at the Spatial Capacity Building research group at the Faculty of Architecture and Art, Hasselt University. Her research focuses on the critical agency of mapping and imaging in spatial design processes. In her Ph.D. thesis, she investigated ‘critical atlassing’ as a dialectical design approach to mapping and dialogues. She obtained a MA in Architecture at Sint-Lucas School of Architecture and Arts, and a MA in Human Settlements at KU Leuven. Her most recent publications include ‘Thinging with the Past: Co-Designing a Slow Road Network by Mediating between the Historical Landscape and the Design Space’ (co-authored with M. Zuljevic and L. Huybrechts; CoDesign, Vol. 19, Issue 3) and ‘Dialectical Design Dialogues: Insights from the Production of an Atlas in a Flemish Residential Neighborhood’ (co-authored with O. Devisch and L. Huybrechts; Journal of Urban Planning, Vol. 5, Issue 4).

Liesbeth Huybrechts, UHasselt

Associate Professor at Hasselt University, working in participatory design and spatial transformation processes in the research group Arck, and Head of the Research Faculty of Architecture and Arts. She earned a Ph.D. and a Postgraduate degree in Cultural Studies, and a master’s in Communication Sciences, all from KU Leuven. Her research focuses on the design for/with participatory exchanges and processes of building capacity between humans and the material/natural environment, and the ‘politics’ of designing these relations. She is the editor-in-chief of CoDesign and part of the second Handbook of Participatory Design editorial committee (Routledge). Some of her most recent publications include Re-framing the Politics of Design (co-edited with O. Devisch and V. Tassinari; Public Space, 2022); and ‘Beyond Polarisation: Reimagining Communities through the Imperfect Act of Ontologizing’ (co-authored with O. Devisch and V. Tassinari; CoDesign, Vol. 18, Issue 1).

References

Akama, Y., & Yee, J. (2016). Seeking Stronger Plurality: Intimacy and Integrity in Designing for Social Innovation. Proceedings of Cumulus Hong Kong 2016, 173–180.

Akama, Y., Hagen, P., & Whaanga-Schollum, D. (2019). Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-designing with Indigenous People. Design and Culture, 11(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306

Bruyne, P. de, & Gielen, P. (Eds.). (2011). Community Art: The Politics of Trespassing. Valiz.

Dankl, K. (2017). Design Age: Towards a Participatory Transformation of Images of Ageing. Design Studies, 48, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.004

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.

Frauenberger, C., Good, J., & Keay-Bright, W. (2011). Designing Technology for Children with Special Needs: Bridging Perspectives Through Participatory Design. CoDesign, 7(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.587013

Garcés, M., & Finkel, L. (2019). Emotional Theory of Rationality. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 13, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00011

Goyens, H., & Huybrechts, L. (2021). Towards a Political Definition of the Sharing Economy: Reflections on the Development of a Sharing Economy Initiative Outside of Big Cities. In M. Teli & C. Bassetti (Eds.), Becoming a Platform in Europe: On the Governance of the Collaborative Economy (pp. 136–158). Now Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680838411.ch7

Groys, B. (2022). Philosophy of Care. Verso.

Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Hendriks, N., Huybrechts, L., Slegers, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2018). Valuing Implicit Decision-making in Participatory Design: A Relational Approach in Design with People with Dementia. Design Studies, 59, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.06.001

Hillier, J. (2011). Strategic Navigation Across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.30

Huybrechts, L., Devisch, O., & Tassinari, V. (2022). Re-framing the Politics of Design. Public Space.

Huybrechts, L., & Teli, M. (2020). The Politics of Co-Design. CoDesign, 16(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1728150

Janzer, C. L., & Weinstein, L. S. (2014). Social Design and Neocolonialism. Design and Culture, 6(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.2752/175613114X14105155617429

Jönsson, L. (2019, June 3). How Can We Come to Care in and Through Design? Nordes 2019 Research Papers. Who Cares? https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2019.011

Kontos, P. C., & Naglie, G. (2007). Expressions of Personhood in Alzheimer’s Disease: An Evaluation of Research-Based Theatre as a Pedagogical Tool. Qualitative Health Research, 17(6), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307302838

Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., & Klawe, M. (2004). The Participatory Design of a Sound and Image Enhanced Daily Planner for People with Aphasia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985744

Mol, A. (2008). I Eat an Apple. On Theorizing Subjectivities. Subjectivity, 22(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.2

Mol, A. (2021). Eating in Theory. Duke University Press.

Schultz, T. (2017). Design’s Role in Transitioning to Futures of Cultures of Repair. In A. Chakrabarti & D. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Research into Design for Communities (Vol. 2, pp. 225–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_19

Schutz, W. (1958). FIRO: A Three-dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. Reinhart and Co.

Schutz, W. (1994). The Human Element: Productivity, Self-esteem, and the Bottom Line (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Smith, R. C., Bossen, C., & Kanstrup, A. M. (2017). Participatory Design in an Era of Participation. CoDesign, 13(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1310466

Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Loi, D., Kambunga, A. P., Samuel, M. M., & Paula, R. de. (2020). Decolonising Participatory Design Practices: Towards Participations Otherwise. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020, 2, 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385172

Wicks, P. G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating Action Research: Challenges and Paradoxes of Opening Communicative Space. Action Research, 7(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750309336715

Wilde, D. (2020). Design Research Education and Global Concerns. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(2), 170–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.003