Veiled Whiteness in Nineteenth-Century Honduran Constitutional Law & Citizenship

Authors

  • Jose I. Lara Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3232/RHI.2017.V10.N2.03

Keywords:

Citizenship, Constitutional Law, Honduras, Racialized Differentiation, Whiteness

Abstract

Race has always been central to the regulation of political membership and constitutional rights in Honduras. This study demonstrates how and why citizenship in Honduras was both restrictive in nature and based on racialized criteria. A nuanced analysis of nineteenth-century constitutions reveals that while governmental leaders did not refer to any racial groups in these legislative documents, they did describe the ideal citizen in implicitly racial terms. The provisos required for the status of citizen, including property ownership, morality and literacy, were built on concepts that have historically been racialized; notions associated with racial difference, Western values and accumulated privileges of systemic white supremacy. By delimiting citizenship in such terms, Honduran leaders characterized it as “white” and used the highest law of the State to exclude most non-European peoples from membership in the polity.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31 — Updated on 2017-12-31

Versions

How to Cite

Lara, J. I. (2017). Veiled Whiteness in Nineteenth-Century Honduran Constitutional Law & Citizenship. Revista De Historia Iberoamericana, 10(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.3232/RHI.2017.V10.N2.03

Issue

Section

Artículos